ढाँचा:Article classification
- Project home - WikiProject
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from the projects banner.
Information on Grading Scheme
WikiProject article quality grading scheme
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 प्रमुख लेख |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | हाम्रो पात्रो (as of February 2023) |
||
| प्रमुख सूची |
The article has attained featured list status.
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
||
 क |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
||
 उत्कृष्ट लेख |
The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
||
| ख | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Human (as of April 2019) |
||
| ग | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
||
| सुरुवात | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ring-tailed cardinalfish (as of June 2018) |
||
| अपुरो | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Crescent Falls (as of June 2018) |
||
| सूची | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018) |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
ढाँचा कागजात[हेर्नुहोस्] [सम्पादन गर्नुहोस्] [इतिहास] [ताजा गर्नुहोस्] | यस ढाँचामा अप्ठ्यारा सुविधाहरू रहेका छन्। कृपया यस ढाँचालाई सम्पादन गर्नु पूर्व यस ढाँचाको व्यवस्थापन तथा पार्सर प्रणालीहरूसँग परिचित हुनुपर्छ र पनि यदि तपाईँले गरेको सम्पादनबाट कुनै जटिल तथा अप्रत्याशित समस्या आएमा तत्कालै आफ्नो सम्पादन फर्काई दिनुहोला, किनकि यो ढाँचा अत्यधिक सङ्ख्याका लेख/पृष्ठहरूमा प्रयोग भइरहेको छ। स्मरण रहोस्: तपाईँ प्रयोग आदि गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ तर यहाँ कुनै पनि प्रयोग गर्नुपूर्व सबै प्रयोग सामान्य ढाँचा प्रयोगस्थलमा अथवा आफ्नो प्रयोगकर्ता प्रयोगस्थलमा गर्नुहोस्। |
Template layout
[सम्पादन गर्नुहोस्]
{{Article classification
|project = <!-- required -->
|template =
-or- <!-- required, either term can be used -->
|banner =
|task_force = <!-- all fields are required if setting taskforce -->
|tf_link =
|parent =
|tf_name =
|title_size =
|title_style=
|nocat =
}}
Usage
[सम्पादन गर्नुहोस्]- project - sets the link to the project
- template or banner - sets the link to the project banner template. Sometimes the banner template is a shared template that is different than the project or uses a different name. Either |template= or |banner= can be used in this field.
- task_force - A "yes" in this field changes the wording and link structure to reflect a task force associated with the quality ratings.
- tf_link - the name of the task force, use the name of the task force as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
- parent - the name of the parent WikiProject, use the name of the project as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
- tf_name - the name of the Taskforce, use the name of the task force as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
- title_size - This field allows changing of the font size in the title box of the template. The default is 12 pt.
- title_style - This field allows changes to the box style. Use standard CSS format, separated by a semi-colon (;).
- nocat - A "yes" in this field enables category suppression. Used when in situations where automatic categorization is not desired, such as here where the template is being shown in an example. Please see this essay for further explanation.
Basic example
[सम्पादन गर्नुहोस्]{{Article classification
|project = Food and drink
|banner = Food and drink
|nocat = yes
}}
will generate:
- Project home - WikiProject Food and drink
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
WikiProject article quality grading scheme
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| प्रमुख लेख |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | हाम्रो पात्रो (as of February 2023) |
||
| प्रमुख सूची |
The article has attained featured list status.
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
||
| क |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
||
| उत्कृष्ट लेख |
The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
||
| ख | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Human (as of April 2019) |
||
| ग | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
||
| सुरुवात | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ring-tailed cardinalfish (as of June 2018) |
||
| अपुरो | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Crescent Falls (as of June 2018) |
||
| सूची | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018) |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Food and drink articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Taskforce example
[सम्पादन गर्नुहोस्]{{Article classification
|project = Herbs and Spices
|task_force = yes
|tf_link = Herbs and Spices task force
|parent = Food and drink
|tf_name = Herbs and Spices
|template = Food and drink
|nocat = yes
}}
will generate:
- Parent WikiProject - WikiProject Herbs and Spices
- Taskforce Link - Herbs and Spices Taskforce
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
WikiProject article quality grading scheme
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| प्रमुख लेख |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | हाम्रो पात्रो (as of February 2023) |
||
| प्रमुख सूची |
The article has attained featured list status.
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
||
| क |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
||
| उत्कृष्ट लेख |
The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
||
| ख | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Human (as of April 2019) |
||
| ग | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
||
| सुरुवात | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ring-tailed cardinalfish (as of June 2018) |
||
| अपुरो | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Crescent Falls (as of June 2018) |
||
| सूची | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018) |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Herbs and Spices articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).