प्रयोगकर्ता वार्ता:Ramesheditor

स्वागतम्!

नमस्कार, Ramesheditor, विकिपिडियामा स्वागत छ! म आशा गर्दछु कि तपाईँलाई विकिपिडिया मनपर्‍यो र यहाँ रमाउनु हुनेछ। दुर्भाग्यवस, तपाईँले सृजना गर्नुभएको मध्ये एक वा बढी पृष्ठहरू, जस्तो कि ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य, विकिपिडियाको सामग्री दिशानिर्देश अनुरूप नहुन सक्छ, र यसलाई सुरक्षित गर्न सकिदैन। सङ्क्षेपमा भन्नुपर्दा, लेखको शीर्षक उल्लेखनीय र पहिले नै विश्वसनीय तथा स्वतन्त्र स्रोतहरूद्वारा प्रकाशित भएको हुनुपर्दछ।

कृपया लेख सृजना प्रक्रियाको विस्तृत सर्वेक्षणको लागि तपाईँको पहिलो लेख समीक्षा गर्नुहोस्। एक लेख सृजना गर्न मद्दतको लागि लेख विजार्ड तपाईँलाई उपलब्ध छ, जहाँ लेखलाई समीक्षा र प्रकाशनको लागि विचार गरिनेछ। अरू कसैले सृजना गर्न सक्ने नयाँ लेखलाई कसरी अनुरोध गर्ने भन्ने बारेमा जानकारीको लागि, अनुरोध गरिएका लेखहरू हेर्नुहोस्। यदि तपाईँ अलमलिनु भएको खण्डमा, चिया घरमा आउनुहोस्, जहाँ अनुभवी विकिपिडियनहरूले तपाईँलाई प्रक्रियाहरूका बारेमा मद्दत गर्न सक्छन्।

विकिपिडियामा नयाँ हुनुहुन्छ? कृपया हाम्रो स्वशिक्षा वा सम्पादन सम्बन्धी आधारभूत कुराहरू सिक्न विकिपिडिया पृष्ठमा योगदान हेर्नुहोस्। तल लेख सृजनाको बारेमा केहि अन्य सहयोगी पृष्ठहरू दिइएको छ।

• नयाँ पृष्ठ कसरी बनाउने
• तपाईँको पहिलो लेख
• राम्रा लेख कसरी लेख्ने
• विकिपिडियाका पाँच स्तम्भ
• सहायता पृष्ठ
• स्वशिक्षा

म आशा गर्दछु कि तपाईँ एक विकिपिडियन भएर सम्पादन गर्दा रमाउनुभयो होला! कृपया वार्ता पृष्ठहरूमा जहिले पनि चारवटा टिल्डहरू (~~~~); प्रयोग गरेर आफ्नो नामको हस्ताक्षर गर्नुहोला यसले स्वतः तपाईँको नाम र मिति सहितको हस्ताक्षर उत्पन्न गर्दछ। यदि तपाईँसँग केहि प्रश्नहरू छन् भने कृपया मलाई मेरो वार्ता पृष्ठमा सोध्न सक्नुहुन्छ वा आफ्नो प्रश्न सहित तपाईँ यो पृष्ठमा {{मद्दत}} ढाँचा राख्न सक्नुहुन्छ, र तपाईँको प्रश्नहरूको जवाफ चाँडैनै कसैले दिनुहुनेछ। फेरि, स्वागत छ! निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} १३:४०, ५ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य शीघ्र मेट्नुपर्नेमा मनोनित

यदि यो तपाईँले सृजना गर्नुभएको पहिलो लेख हो भने, तपाईँ लेखन सहयोग स्वशिक्षा पढ्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

लेख सृजना गर्न मद्दत गर्ने लेख सहायिका पनि तपाईँ प्रयोग गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

यस ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्यलाई विकिपिडिया देखि चाँडैनै मेटिने भनेर एउटा चिनो राखिएको छ। यसले ले७ मापदण्ड अन्तर्गत एक वास्तविक व्यक्ति वा मानिसहरूको समूहलाई जनाउदछ। विकिपिडियाको विश्वसनीयता ज्ञानकोशमा भएका सम्पूर्ण सामग्री प्रमाणित भएको हुनुपर्नेछ । तर विश्वसनीयता नभएका सम्पूर्ण सामग्रीलाई शीघ्र मेट्नुपर्ने मापदण्डको आधारमा कुनै पनि समयमा मेटाउन सकिन्छ। थप जानकारिका लागि कृपया विकिपिडिया उल्लेखनियता पढ्नुहोला।

यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ पृष्ठलाई यस कारणले मेटाउनु हुँदैन, तपाईँ नामाङ्कन विरोध गर्न पृष्ठमा गएर आफ्नो विचार राख्नुहोला। यसले तपाईँलाई पृष्ठ किन मेटाउनु हुँदैन वर्णन गर्ने अवसर दिनेछ। यद्यपि, याद रहोस्, एक पटक पृष्ठ शीघ्र मेटाउन अङ्कित भएमा, यो तत्काल मेटाइनेछ। कृपया पृष्ठबाट शीघ्र मेटाउने चिनो आफैंले नहटाउनुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाको नीति तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि पृष्ठ मेटिसकिएको, र भविष्यका सन्दर्भ वा सुधारको लागि तपाईँ मेटाइएको सामग्री पुनःप्राप्त गर्न चाहनुहुन्छ भने, कृपया मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} १३:४०, ५ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य शीघ्र मेट्नुपर्नेमा मनोनित

यदि यो तपाईँले सृजना गर्नुभएको पहिलो लेख हो भने, तपाईँ लेखन सहयोग स्वशिक्षा पढ्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

लेख सृजना गर्न मद्दत गर्ने लेख सहायिका पनि तपाईँ प्रयोग गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

यस ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्यलाई विकिपिडिया देखि चाँडैनै मेटिने भनेर एउटा चिनो राखिएको छ। यसले ले७ मापदण्ड अन्तर्गत एक वास्तविक व्यक्ति वा मानिसहरूको समूहलाई जनाउदछ। विकिपिडियाको विश्वसनीयता ज्ञानकोशमा भएका सम्पूर्ण सामग्री प्रमाणित भएको हुनुपर्नेछ । तर विश्वसनीयता नभएका सम्पूर्ण सामग्रीलाई शीघ्र मेट्नुपर्ने मापदण्डको आधारमा कुनै पनि समयमा मेटाउन सकिन्छ। थप जानकारिका लागि कृपया विकिपिडिया उल्लेखनियता पढ्नुहोला।

यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ पृष्ठलाई यस कारणले मेटाउनु हुँदैन, तपाईँ नामाङ्कन विरोध गर्न पृष्ठमा गएर आफ्नो विचार राख्नुहोला। यसले तपाईँलाई पृष्ठ किन मेटाउनु हुँदैन वर्णन गर्ने अवसर दिनेछ। यद्यपि, याद रहोस्, एक पटक पृष्ठ शीघ्र मेटाउन अङ्कित भएमा, यो तत्काल मेटाइनेछ। कृपया पृष्ठबाट शीघ्र मेटाउने चिनो आफैंले नहटाउनुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाको नीति तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि पृष्ठ मेटिसकिएको, र भविष्यका सन्दर्भ वा सुधारको लागि तपाईँ मेटाइएको सामग्री पुनःप्राप्त गर्न चाहनुहुन्छ भने, कृपया मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} १४:५३, ५ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्यलाई शीघ्र मेटाउने

यदि यो तपाईँले सृजना गर्नुभएको पहिलो लेख हो भने, तपाईँ लेखन सहयोग स्वशिक्षा पढ्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

लेख सृजना गर्न मद्दत गर्ने लेख सहायिका पनि तपाईँ प्रयोग गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

पृष्ठ ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य विकिपिडियाबाट शीघ्र मेटाइएको छ। यो शीघ्र मेटाउने मापदण्डको खण्ड ले७ अन्तर्गत गरिएको थियो, किनभने लेख a real person or group of people र लेख किन विश्वकोशमा समावेश गर्नुपर्दछ भन्ने विषयको महत्त्व तथा विश्वसनीयतालाई नदर्साएको। शीघ्र मेटाउन मापदण्ड अन्तर्गत, त्यस्ता लेख कुनै पनि समय मेट्न सकिन्छ। सामान्यतया उल्लेखनीय रूपमा स्वीकार्य विषयबारे कृपया थप पढ्नुहोस्।

कृपया यी चिन्ताहरूलाई सम्बोधन नगरीकन सामग्री पुन: सृजना नगर्नुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाका नीतिहरू तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ यो पृष्ठ यस कारणले मेटाइनु हुँदैन, भविष्यका सन्दर्भ वा सुधारको लागि मेटाइएको सामग्री पुन: प्राप्त गर्न चाहनुहुन्छ भने, कृपया मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} १५:१६, ५ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

कैलाश प्रसाद शाहलाई शीघ्र मेटाउने

यदि यो तपाईँले सृजना गर्नुभएको पहिलो लेख हो भने, तपाईँ लेखन सहयोग स्वशिक्षा पढ्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

लेख सृजना गर्न मद्दत गर्ने लेख सहायिका पनि तपाईँ प्रयोग गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ।

पृष्ठ कैलाश प्रसाद शाह विकिपिडियाबाट शीघ्र मेटाइएको छ। यो शीघ्र मेटाउने मापदण्डको खण्ड ले७ अन्तर्गत गरिएको थियो, किनभने लेख a real person or group of people र लेख किन विश्वकोशमा समावेश गर्नुपर्दछ भन्ने विषयको महत्त्व तथा विश्वसनीयतालाई नदर्साएको। शीघ्र मेटाउन मापदण्ड अन्तर्गत, त्यस्ता लेख कुनै पनि समय मेट्न सकिन्छ। सामान्यतया उल्लेखनीय रूपमा स्वीकार्य विषयबारे कृपया थप पढ्नुहोस्।

कृपया यी चिन्ताहरूलाई सम्बोधन नगरीकन सामग्री पुन: सृजना नगर्नुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाका नीतिहरू तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ यो पृष्ठ यस कारणले मेटाइनु हुँदैन, भविष्यका सन्दर्भ वा सुधारको लागि मेटाइएको सामग्री पुन: प्राप्त गर्न चाहनुहुन्छ भने, कृपया मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} ०९:२३, १९ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्यलाई शीघ्र मेटाउने

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It appeared to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It was unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
• It was an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
  Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
• It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

• It was a draft which had not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a disambiguation page which either: disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title. (See section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a very short article that provided little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appeared to have the same content as an article that exists on another Wikimedia project. This may be because it was copied and pasted from that article, or because it was transwikied from the English Wikipedia to another project. (See section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) To learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English, please see Wikipedia:Translation.
• It was an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consisted only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It consisted of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded. (See section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appeared to be about a musical recording which did not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted, or is eligible for deletion itself. (See section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
• It covered a topic on which we already have an article - [[:{{{article}}}]]. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]], or to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].
• It appeared to be about something made up, and it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• The image was an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links were updated. (See section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. (See section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it had not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content [१], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or was not used in any articles. (See section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then you should contact the deleting administrator and do two things. First, please state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. Second, please provide the relevant copyright tag.
• It was a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise failed some part of the non-free content criteria. (See section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file could be used under the fair use guidelines, you can re-upload it, but you must ensure you place the correct tag on it. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file.
• The image appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. (See section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
• It was a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use. (See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It contained a gallery in the userspace which consisted chiefly of fair use or non-free images. (See section U3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot allow non-free and copyrighted images to be used on user pages, and user pages containing galleries of such images may be eligible for speedy deletion.
• It appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space. (See section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a file namespace redirect shadowing a file on Commons with no incoming links. (See section R4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a portal which would have been subject to speedy deletion had it been an article. (See section P1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal. (See section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

कृपया यी चिन्ताहरूलाई सम्बोधन नगरीकन सामग्री पुन: सृजना नगर्नुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाका नीतिहरू तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ यो पृष्ठ यस कारणले मेटाइनु हुँदैन, तपाईँ मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्, वा यदि तपाईँले पहिले नै त्यसो गरिसक्नु भएको भए, तपाईँ विकिपीडिया:मेटाउने समीक्षामा छलफल खोल्न सक्नुहुन्छ। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} ०९:२५, १९ अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)

डा. ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्यलाई शीघ्र मेटाउने

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that डा. ओमकार प्रसाद वैद्य, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
• It appeared to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It was unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
• It was an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
  Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
• It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

• It was a draft which had not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a disambiguation page which either: disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)"; or disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title. (See section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a very short article that provided little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appeared to have the same content as an article that exists on another Wikimedia project. This may be because it was copied and pasted from that article, or because it was transwikied from the English Wikipedia to another project. (See section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) To learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English, please see Wikipedia:Translation.
• It was an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consisted only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It consisted of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded. (See section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appeared to be about a musical recording which did not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted, or is eligible for deletion itself. (See section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
• It covered a topic on which we already have an article - [[:{{{article}}}]]. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]], or to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].
• It appeared to be about something made up, and it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• The image was an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links were updated. (See section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. (See section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it had not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content [२], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or was not used in any articles. (See section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then you should contact the deleting administrator and do two things. First, please state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. Second, please provide the relevant copyright tag.
• It was a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise failed some part of the non-free content criteria. (See section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file could be used under the fair use guidelines, you can re-upload it, but you must ensure you place the correct tag on it. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file.
• The image appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. (See section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
• It was a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use. (See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It contained a gallery in the userspace which consisted chiefly of fair use or non-free images. (See section U3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot allow non-free and copyrighted images to be used on user pages, and user pages containing galleries of such images may be eligible for speedy deletion.
• It appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space. (See section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a file namespace redirect shadowing a file on Commons with no incoming links. (See section R4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a portal which would have been subject to speedy deletion had it been an article. (See section P1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
• It was a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal. (See section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

कृपया यी चिन्ताहरूलाई सम्बोधन नगरीकन सामग्री पुन: सृजना नगर्नुहोला, तर विकिपिडियाका नीतिहरू तथा दिशानिर्देशहरू अनुरूप जानकारी थप्न नहिचकिचाउनुहोला। यदि तपाईँलाई लाग्छ यो पृष्ठ यस कारणले मेटाइनु हुँदैन, तपाईँ मेटाउने प्रशासकलाई सम्पर्क गर्नुहोस्, वा यदि तपाईँले पहिले नै त्यसो गरिसक्नु भएको भए, तपाईँ विकिपीडिया:मेटाउने समीक्षामा छलफल खोल्न सक्नुहुन्छ। निर्मल दुलाल ^{(कुरा गर्नुहोस)} ०९:२९, २० अप्रिल २०२३ (नेपाली समय)